<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 184 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364712</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad upheld the demand for the short-received quantity of imported materials in manufacturing due to non-compliance with the conditions of Notification 40/2006-Cus. The appellant&#039;s claim for exemption was rejected as they failed to meet the mandatory requirements, including using the imported materials in manufacturing and providing a certificate from the Excise Officer. Previous judgments emphasizing strict adherence to exemption notification conditions were cited, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. The Tribunal concluded that the issue was settled against the appellant, affirming the decision based on the violation of exemption conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 184 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364712</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad upheld the demand for the short-received quantity of imported materials in manufacturing due to non-compliance with the conditions of Notification 40/2006-Cus. The appellant&#039;s claim for exemption was rejected as they failed to meet the mandatory requirements, including using the imported materials in manufacturing and providing a certificate from the Excise Officer. Previous judgments emphasizing strict adherence to exemption notification conditions were cited, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. The Tribunal concluded that the issue was settled against the appellant, affirming the decision based on the violation of exemption conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>