https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364710 The appellant contested the ownership of a property subject to confiscation under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, citing it as a tenancy property. They raised concerns about procedural irregularities and violations of natural justice principles. The Tribunal granted an interim stay against dispossession, requiring the appellant to deposit a specified amount monthly. Both parties agreed to continue the attachment order until the criminal complaint's resolution, with the appellant depositing charges until then. The judgment disposed of the appeal, allowing relief if proceedings favored the appellant, including charge refunds and property release. en-us Mon, 01 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Aug 2018 08:33:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364710 The appellant contested the ownership of a property subject to confiscation under the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, citing it as a tenancy property. They raised concerns about procedural irregularities and violations of natural justice principles. The Tribunal granted an interim stay against dispossession, requiring the appellant to deposit a specified amount monthly. Both parties agreed to continue the attachment order until the criminal complaint's resolution, with the appellant depositing charges until then. The judgment disposed of the appeal, allowing relief if proceedings favored the appellant, including charge refunds and property release. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 01 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364710