https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364707 The tribunal concluded that the appellant complied with the conditions of Notification No. 1/2006-ST for contracts where the exemption was availed, and the availing of CENVAT credit in other contracts does not affect this compliance. The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and referencing previous judgments. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for verification of the appellant's assertion regarding CENVAT credit availed only for projects not covered by Notification No. 1/2006-ST. en-us Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Aug 2018 08:32:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364707 The tribunal concluded that the appellant complied with the conditions of Notification No. 1/2006-ST for contracts where the exemption was availed, and the availing of CENVAT credit in other contracts does not affect this compliance. The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and referencing previous judgments. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for verification of the appellant's assertion regarding CENVAT credit availed only for projects not covered by Notification No. 1/2006-ST. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364707