https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364705 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing CENVAT credit for various input services despite challenges related to invoices not in the name of the branch office service provider and lack of document production. The Tribunal emphasized the essential nature of the services for the manufacturing process and referred to legal provisions to support their decision. The Revenue's appeal against the Order-in-Appeal was rejected, affirming the eligibility of the appellant to avail CENVAT credit for specified services. The Tribunal disposed of all appeals on 27/07/2018, directing certain cases for reevaluation based on principles of natural justice. en-us Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364705 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing CENVAT credit for various input services despite challenges related to invoices not in the name of the branch office service provider and lack of document production. The Tribunal emphasized the essential nature of the services for the manufacturing process and referred to legal provisions to support their decision. The Revenue's appeal against the Order-in-Appeal was rejected, affirming the eligibility of the appellant to avail CENVAT credit for specified services. The Tribunal disposed of all appeals on 27/07/2018, directing certain cases for reevaluation based on principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364705