https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364702 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue's appeal regarding the demand for differential Service Tax from the respondent for the period 2003-04 to 2006-07. The first appellate authority's decision was supported, emphasizing that the current show cause notice mirrored a previous notice, thus invoking limitation and not warranting interference. The core issue of differential Service Tax liability was resolved in favor of the respondent, as the demands were deemed repetitive and not justifying an extended period of limitation. en-us Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364702 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue's appeal regarding the demand for differential Service Tax from the respondent for the period 2003-04 to 2006-07. The first appellate authority's decision was supported, emphasizing that the current show cause notice mirrored a previous notice, thus invoking limitation and not warranting interference. The core issue of differential Service Tax liability was resolved in favor of the respondent, as the demands were deemed repetitive and not justifying an extended period of limitation. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364702