https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364694 The appeals involved Central Excise duty demands on shortages detected during stock taking, alleged clandestine removal of goods, undervaluation of goods sold, evasion of Central Excise Duty, personal penalties imposition, admissibility of evidence, and limitation period for the show cause notice. The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the manufacturer-appellant in each instance, finding the evidence insufficient or lacking authenticity, and ruling in favor of the appellants on issues such as admissibility of evidence, personal penalties, and the limitation period for the show cause notice. en-us Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Sep 2018 12:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364694 The appeals involved Central Excise duty demands on shortages detected during stock taking, alleged clandestine removal of goods, undervaluation of goods sold, evasion of Central Excise Duty, personal penalties imposition, admissibility of evidence, and limitation period for the show cause notice. The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the manufacturer-appellant in each instance, finding the evidence insufficient or lacking authenticity, and ruling in favor of the appellants on issues such as admissibility of evidence, personal penalties, and the limitation period for the show cause notice. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364694