https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364693 The Tribunal concluded that the allegations of clandestine removal of ingots against the manufacturer were not substantiated with sufficient proof. The judgment set aside the penalties imposed, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence and procedural correctness. The decision provided consequential relief to the appellants, highlighting the necessity of adhering to procedural norms in cases involving serious charges like clandestine activities. en-us Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364693 The Tribunal concluded that the allegations of clandestine removal of ingots against the manufacturer were not substantiated with sufficient proof. The judgment set aside the penalties imposed, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence and procedural correctness. The decision provided consequential relief to the appellants, highlighting the necessity of adhering to procedural norms in cases involving serious charges like clandestine activities. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364693