<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 1748 - ITAT Hyderabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274239</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the disallowance u/s. 14A of the Income Tax Act. It held that the disallowance under Rule 8D cannot exceed the dividend income earned and claimed as exempt. Therefore, the disallowance was restricted to the amount of dividend earned, directing the Assessing Officer to modify the disallowance accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 07:59:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 1748 - ITAT Hyderabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274239</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the disallowance u/s. 14A of the Income Tax Act. It held that the disallowance under Rule 8D cannot exceed the dividend income earned and claimed as exempt. Therefore, the disallowance was restricted to the amount of dividend earned, directing the Assessing Officer to modify the disallowance accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>