<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1311 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274224</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decision of the learned Single Judge, denying the prayer for the return of seized documents. The appeal was dismissed as the Court found it beyond the scope of the proceeding to determine whether the documents were originals or photocopies. However, the appellant was granted the right to raise this issue in future proceedings where relevant, allowing for further exploration of the nature of the documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1311 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274224</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decision of the learned Single Judge, denying the prayer for the return of seized documents. The appeal was dismissed as the Court found it beyond the scope of the proceeding to determine whether the documents were originals or photocopies. However, the appellant was granted the right to raise this issue in future proceedings where relevant, allowing for further exploration of the nature of the documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>