<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1375 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274227</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petitions, overturning the Tax Board&#039;s decision and concluding that &quot;Gypsum Board&quot; is covered under entry 56 of Schedule (IV) as &quot;Gypsum in all its form,&quot; warranting a lower tax rate of 4%. The court emphasized the common parlance test and popular understanding in interpreting tax entries, determining that the manufacturing process and composition of &quot;Gypsum Board&quot; align with the classification under entry 56.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 07:56:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1375 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274227</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petitions, overturning the Tax Board&#039;s decision and concluding that &quot;Gypsum Board&quot; is covered under entry 56 of Schedule (IV) as &quot;Gypsum in all its form,&quot; warranting a lower tax rate of 4%. The court emphasized the common parlance test and popular understanding in interpreting tax entries, determining that the manufacturing process and composition of &quot;Gypsum Board&quot; align with the classification under entry 56.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>