https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274213 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue's appeal against dropping the demand of service tax under the category of business auxiliary service. The decision was based on consistency in legal rulings and reliance on precedent, particularly a previous case where a similar issue was decided in favor of the respondent. The Tribunal affirmed the correctness and legality of the first appellate authority's decision, emphasizing the importance of consistency and adherence to established legal principles in determining case outcomes. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Aug 2018 07:56:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274213 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the Revenue's appeal against dropping the demand of service tax under the category of business auxiliary service. The decision was based on consistency in legal rulings and reliance on precedent, particularly a previous case where a similar issue was decided in favor of the respondent. The Tribunal affirmed the correctness and legality of the first appellate authority's decision, emphasizing the importance of consistency and adherence to established legal principles in determining case outcomes. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274213