https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274210 A quarry permission already upheld on scientific and factual grounds could not be reopened in writ jurisdiction without fresh cogent material. The High Court rejected the challenge to the District Collector's no-objection certificate and the Pollution Control Board's consent to operate because the petitioner showed no present illegality, environmental prejudice, or factual basis for interference. The prayer for a fresh environmental damage assessment was also declined for want of convincing evidence. However, the Court directed periodic monthly inspection by the Local Monitoring Committee to ensure compliance with the conditions attached to the quarry authorization. en-us Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Aug 2018 18:36:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274210 A quarry permission already upheld on scientific and factual grounds could not be reopened in writ jurisdiction without fresh cogent material. The High Court rejected the challenge to the District Collector's no-objection certificate and the Pollution Control Board's consent to operate because the petitioner showed no present illegality, environmental prejudice, or factual basis for interference. The prayer for a fresh environmental damage assessment was also declined for want of convincing evidence. However, the Court directed periodic monthly inspection by the Local Monitoring Committee to ensure compliance with the conditions attached to the quarry authorization. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274210