https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13922 The value of materials supplied by the Government for execution of contracts was held not to be included in gross turnover, because the issue was governed by the binding Supreme Court ruling in Brij Bhushan Lal Parduman Kumar v. CIT, which had displaced the earlier contrary view of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. On that basis, the answer on inclusion was given in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The further question on estimating additional profit on that footing was left unanswered as academic. en-us Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 May 2010 00:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13922 The value of materials supplied by the Government for execution of contracts was held not to be included in gross turnover, because the issue was governed by the binding Supreme Court ruling in Brij Bhushan Lal Parduman Kumar v. CIT, which had displaced the earlier contrary view of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. On that basis, the answer on inclusion was given in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. The further question on estimating additional profit on that footing was left unanswered as academic. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 21 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13922