<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 623 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274208</link>
    <description>A special statutory regime governing co-operative society employees prevailed over the industrial recovery mechanism: claims for ex gratia payment tied to service conditions and allowances could not be pursued under Section 6H(1) where no existing adjudicated right existed and the entitlement was disputed. The Court held that the U.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1965, the service regulations, and the Registrar&#039;s binding orders formed a complete code for such matters, and the Labour Commissioner could not disregard those statutory restrictions. The private agreement and later resolutions were also unenforceable because they conflicted with the regulations and lacked the necessary statutory footing. Past payments already made were left undisturbed, but no future entitlement was recognised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 15:26:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 623 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274208</link>
      <description>A special statutory regime governing co-operative society employees prevailed over the industrial recovery mechanism: claims for ex gratia payment tied to service conditions and allowances could not be pursued under Section 6H(1) where no existing adjudicated right existed and the entitlement was disputed. The Court held that the U.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1965, the service regulations, and the Registrar&#039;s binding orders formed a complete code for such matters, and the Labour Commissioner could not disregard those statutory restrictions. The private agreement and later resolutions were also unenforceable because they conflicted with the regulations and lacked the necessary statutory footing. Past payments already made were left undisturbed, but no future entitlement was recognised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>