<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (9) TMI 71 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274206</link>
    <description>Rules 189 and 190 of the A.P. Motor Vehicles Rules, 1964 were examined against the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, on the basis that the Act empowered the State Government to prescribe by rules the appellate forum and the manner of its functioning. The rules were treated as valid because they could authorise constitution of the appellate authority from among State Transport Authority members and provide for a quorum, without amounting to unauthorised sub-delegation. The commentary also notes that comparative assessment of applicants&#039; merits and service record was viewed as a matter for the competent authority, and not one for reappreciation in writ jurisdiction absent jurisdictional error or legal infirmity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:12:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (9) TMI 71 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274206</link>
      <description>Rules 189 and 190 of the A.P. Motor Vehicles Rules, 1964 were examined against the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, on the basis that the Act empowered the State Government to prescribe by rules the appellate forum and the manner of its functioning. The rules were treated as valid because they could authorise constitution of the appellate authority from among State Transport Authority members and provide for a quorum, without amounting to unauthorised sub-delegation. The commentary also notes that comparative assessment of applicants&#039; merits and service record was viewed as a matter for the competent authority, and not one for reappreciation in writ jurisdiction absent jurisdictional error or legal infirmity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>