<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Commissioner (Appeals) Overlooks Key Evidence; Order Set Aside Due to Unreviewed Correspondences by Appellant.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40618</link>
    <description>Non-speaking order - Though the appellant have placed various correspondences to show that there is no suppression of fact but instead of dealing with those material, the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) conveniently ignored the same and concurred with the adjudicating authority - order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 12:57:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 12:57:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Commissioner (Appeals) Overlooks Key Evidence; Order Set Aside Due to Unreviewed Correspondences by Appellant.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40618</link>
      <description>Non-speaking order - Though the appellant have placed various correspondences to show that there is no suppression of fact but instead of dealing with those material, the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) conveniently ignored the same and concurred with the adjudicating authority - order set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 12:57:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>