<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 112 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364640</link>
    <description>The High Court condoned the 67-day delay in re-filing the appeal and allowed the exemption application, enabling the appellant to proceed with the legal proceedings. Regarding the imposition of a higher penalty on the appellant compared to other employees in a forgery case, the Court found the differentiation unjustified as the roles were not significantly different. Consequently, the appellant&#039;s penalty was reduced from Rs. 20 lacs to Rs. 6 lacs under each relevant provision, with the appellant directed to deposit the reduced amount within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 112 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364640</link>
      <description>The High Court condoned the 67-day delay in re-filing the appeal and allowed the exemption application, enabling the appellant to proceed with the legal proceedings. Regarding the imposition of a higher penalty on the appellant compared to other employees in a forgery case, the Court found the differentiation unjustified as the roles were not significantly different. Consequently, the appellant&#039;s penalty was reduced from Rs. 20 lacs to Rs. 6 lacs under each relevant provision, with the appellant directed to deposit the reduced amount within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>