<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 96 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364624</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the connected central excise appeals after noting that a similar appeal in the Nitin Spinners matter had already been dismissed by its earlier order. The Court perused the material and, following that prior disposition, rejected these appeals as well. The order records condonation of delay, but the operative outcome was dismissal of the appeals in line with the earlier connected decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 07:49:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 96 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364624</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the connected central excise appeals after noting that a similar appeal in the Nitin Spinners matter had already been dismissed by its earlier order. The Court perused the material and, following that prior disposition, rejected these appeals as well. The order records condonation of delay, but the operative outcome was dismissal of the appeals in line with the earlier connected decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>