<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1127 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274197</link>
    <description>Where the Revenue had not challenged the Tribunal&#039;s order, the High Court correctly rejected the revision petition and no further interference with its revisional jurisdiction was warranted. The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing but found no basis to grant special leave to appeal, so the SLP was not entertained and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 07:44:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1127 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274197</link>
      <description>Where the Revenue had not challenged the Tribunal&#039;s order, the High Court correctly rejected the revision petition and no further interference with its revisional jurisdiction was warranted. The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing but found no basis to grant special leave to appeal, so the SLP was not entertained and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>