<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1344 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274195</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that the surplus amount in the freight export account and insurance export was derived from export activities and eligible for deduction under Section 10AA. The Court agreed that there was no evidence of arrangements to inflate profits, supporting the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the exemption under Section 10AA. Additionally, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s rejection of the Revenue&#039;s contention regarding disallowance of deduction under Section 10AA for deemed profit, emphasizing the lack of evidence of arrangements aimed at producing more than normal profit. The appeals were dismissed as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 07:44:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1344 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274195</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming that the surplus amount in the freight export account and insurance export was derived from export activities and eligible for deduction under Section 10AA. The Court agreed that there was no evidence of arrangements to inflate profits, supporting the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the exemption under Section 10AA. Additionally, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s rejection of the Revenue&#039;s contention regarding disallowance of deduction under Section 10AA for deemed profit, emphasizing the lack of evidence of arrangements aimed at producing more than normal profit. The appeals were dismissed as no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>