<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1345 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274196</link>
    <description>Delay in re-filing was condoned in the connected applications, and the appeals were admitted. The court also noted for consideration, along with a connected appeal, the issue whether incentive amounts received from engine manufacturers were capital in nature. No final ruling on the character of the incentive receipts is stated in the provided text.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 07:44:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=529073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1345 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274196</link>
      <description>Delay in re-filing was condoned in the connected applications, and the appeals were admitted. The court also noted for consideration, along with a connected appeal, the issue whether incentive amounts received from engine manufacturers were capital in nature. No final ruling on the character of the incentive receipts is stated in the provided text.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>