https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364596 The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Tribunal's decision on the admissibility of CENVAT Credit for disputed input services. The judgment emphasized the established legal position supported by precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, highlighting the significance of legal reasoning in interpreting and applying judgments. The court clarified that interim orders do not negate the legal basis of a judgment, maintaining the validity of decisions despite pending appeals or stays. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Aug 2018 13:46:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364596 The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Tribunal's decision on the admissibility of CENVAT Credit for disputed input services. The judgment emphasized the established legal position supported by precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, highlighting the significance of legal reasoning in interpreting and applying judgments. The court clarified that interim orders do not negate the legal basis of a judgment, maintaining the validity of decisions despite pending appeals or stays. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364596