https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364591 The court upheld the cancellation of the auction sale and the decision to conduct a fresh auction of the property. It found that the authorities had valid reasons for their actions, including the higher valuation of the property and the petitioner's failure to participate in the subsequent auction despite being given the opportunity. The court concluded that the actions were not arbitrary and did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to match the highest bid from the fresh auction if desired. en-us Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364591 The court upheld the cancellation of the auction sale and the decision to conduct a fresh auction of the property. It found that the authorities had valid reasons for their actions, including the higher valuation of the property and the petitioner's failure to participate in the subsequent auction despite being given the opportunity. The court concluded that the actions were not arbitrary and did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution. The petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to match the highest bid from the fresh auction if desired. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364591