https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13898 The court upheld the validity of the order passed under section 281B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, allowing the provisional attachment of the petitioner-society's bank accounts and properties. The court found sufficient justification for the attachment to protect the interests of the Revenue, citing financial irregularities and the need to prevent asset disposal. Despite the petitioner's claims of hindrance to charitable activities, the court ruled that the attachment did not significantly impede its operations. Ultimately, the court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the necessity and legality of the attachment to safeguard Revenue interests, emphasizing limited judicial review scope under Article 226. en-us Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jul 2009 17:32:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13898 The court upheld the validity of the order passed under section 281B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, allowing the provisional attachment of the petitioner-society's bank accounts and properties. The court found sufficient justification for the attachment to protect the interests of the Revenue, citing financial irregularities and the need to prevent asset disposal. Despite the petitioner's claims of hindrance to charitable activities, the court ruled that the attachment did not significantly impede its operations. Ultimately, the court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the necessity and legality of the attachment to safeguard Revenue interests, emphasizing limited judicial review scope under Article 226. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13898