<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 56 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364584</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed appeals by both the department and the assessee. Relief was granted to the assessee concerning the disallowance of legal and professional charges and the ad hoc disallowance of conference expenses. However, the disallowance of capital expenditure was upheld, and the issue of directors&#039; remuneration was remanded back to the AO for re-examination. The disallowance under section 14A was deleted due to the lack of recorded satisfaction by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 06:49:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 56 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364584</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed appeals by both the department and the assessee. Relief was granted to the assessee concerning the disallowance of legal and professional charges and the ad hoc disallowance of conference expenses. However, the disallowance of capital expenditure was upheld, and the issue of directors&#039; remuneration was remanded back to the AO for re-examination. The disallowance under section 14A was deleted due to the lack of recorded satisfaction by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>