<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 47 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364575</link>
    <description>Tariff classification of a coffee roasting machine turned on its principal function: because roasting was gas-fired and electricity served only rotation and ancillary operations, the unit fell under Heading 8419 as machinery for roasting coffee beans, not under Heading 8516 for electro-thermic domestic appliances. The exemption claim under Notification No. 21/2002-Customs also failed because the notification was construed strictly and required full satisfaction of its tariff-description conditions. As the goods did not answer the stated classification condition, the exemption could not be extended by implication for industrial use in the plantation sector.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 47 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364575</link>
      <description>Tariff classification of a coffee roasting machine turned on its principal function: because roasting was gas-fired and electricity served only rotation and ancillary operations, the unit fell under Heading 8419 as machinery for roasting coffee beans, not under Heading 8516 for electro-thermic domestic appliances. The exemption claim under Notification No. 21/2002-Customs also failed because the notification was construed strictly and required full satisfaction of its tariff-description conditions. As the goods did not answer the stated classification condition, the exemption could not be extended by implication for industrial use in the plantation sector.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>