<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 21 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364549</link>
    <description>The tribunal denied the appellant&#039;s adjournment request regarding the demand of service tax on transportation of sugarcane. It found that the issue was similar to a precedent case where service tax was not payable by sugar mills. Relying on this precedent, the tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 06:47:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 21 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364549</link>
      <description>The tribunal denied the appellant&#039;s adjournment request regarding the demand of service tax on transportation of sugarcane. It found that the issue was similar to a precedent case where service tax was not payable by sugar mills. Relying on this precedent, the tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>