<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 16 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364544</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order denying CENVAT Credit to the appellant for services of handling contractors for lifting and disposal of hazardous waste. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering such services as essential for maintaining environmental standards and complying with pollution control requirements. It concluded that denying CENVAT Credit for these services was unjustified, in line with established legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 06:47:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 16 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364544</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order denying CENVAT Credit to the appellant for services of handling contractors for lifting and disposal of hazardous waste. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering such services as essential for maintaining environmental standards and complying with pollution control requirements. It concluded that denying CENVAT Credit for these services was unjustified, in line with established legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>