<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 9 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364537</link>
    <description>A seven-day delay in filing the statement prescribed under Notification No. 56/2002-CE did not forfeit the assessee&#039;s entitlement to self credit and refund. The Tribunal treated the filing deadline as a procedural requirement, not a substantive eligibility condition, and held that belated compliance with such formalities does not defeat exemption benefit where the assessee is otherwise eligible. Because the denial rested only on delayed submission, the refusal of benefit was unsustainable and the assessee retained the notification relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 06:47:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 9 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364537</link>
      <description>A seven-day delay in filing the statement prescribed under Notification No. 56/2002-CE did not forfeit the assessee&#039;s entitlement to self credit and refund. The Tribunal treated the filing deadline as a procedural requirement, not a substantive eligibility condition, and held that belated compliance with such formalities does not defeat exemption benefit where the assessee is otherwise eligible. Because the denial rested only on delayed submission, the refusal of benefit was unsustainable and the assessee retained the notification relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>