<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 8 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364536</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the concessional rate of duty for Adhesive Tape under Tariff Item No. 30051020. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of presenting sustainable arguments and establishing the unsustainability of previous findings when challenging a decision. It highlighted the need for thorough legal analysis and adherence to procedural requirements in appellate proceedings. The judgment serves as a reminder of the burden on the appealing party to demonstrate the inadequacy of prior findings and the principles governing reconsideration of issues already adjudicated upon by the First Appellate Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 8 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364536</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the concessional rate of duty for Adhesive Tape under Tariff Item No. 30051020. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of presenting sustainable arguments and establishing the unsustainability of previous findings when challenging a decision. It highlighted the need for thorough legal analysis and adherence to procedural requirements in appellate proceedings. The judgment serves as a reminder of the burden on the appealing party to demonstrate the inadequacy of prior findings and the principles governing reconsideration of issues already adjudicated upon by the First Appellate Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>