<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1599 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274166</link>
    <description>Amount received under a development agreement was not treated as sale consideration for transfer of land because the arrangement was for development of the project and protection of the parties&#039; rights, not a conveyance of the land. The land continued as stock-in-trade, so Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act did not apply, and the security deposit was recorded only as a liability rather than consideration for transfer. Section 28(va) of the Income-tax Act also did not apply because the receipt was not for refraining from any competing activity. The addition made by the lower authority was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 21:30:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1599 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274166</link>
      <description>Amount received under a development agreement was not treated as sale consideration for transfer of land because the arrangement was for development of the project and protection of the parties&#039; rights, not a conveyance of the land. The land continued as stock-in-trade, so Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act did not apply, and the security deposit was recorded only as a liability rather than consideration for transfer. Section 28(va) of the Income-tax Act also did not apply because the receipt was not for refraining from any competing activity. The addition made by the lower authority was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>