<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1434 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274169</link>
    <description>The High Court addressed common questions of law and facts in two appeals challenging the Tribunal&#039;s judgment regarding undisclosed bank deposits and commission income. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete additions related to undisclosed bank deposits and commission income, emphasizing the importance of considering all transactions and circumstantial evidence. Additionally, the court supported the Tribunal&#039;s findings in favor of the assessee concerning transactions with a specific company and loose papers found during search operations, highlighting discrepancies in the assessing authority&#039;s conclusions. The court dismissed the appeals and suggested appropriate actions by the department against any wrongdoing parties mentioned in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 21:30:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1434 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274169</link>
      <description>The High Court addressed common questions of law and facts in two appeals challenging the Tribunal&#039;s judgment regarding undisclosed bank deposits and commission income. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete additions related to undisclosed bank deposits and commission income, emphasizing the importance of considering all transactions and circumstantial evidence. Additionally, the court supported the Tribunal&#039;s findings in favor of the assessee concerning transactions with a specific company and loose papers found during search operations, highlighting discrepancies in the assessing authority&#039;s conclusions. The court dismissed the appeals and suggested appropriate actions by the department against any wrongdoing parties mentioned in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>