<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 689 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274157</link>
    <description>Rejection of the highest bid in a public auction is valid only if based on relevant considerations and a reasoned, non-arbitrary process consistent with Article 14. The approving authority compared the hotel plot with smaller plots at a different location without properly accounting for differences in size, use, location, prior failed auctions, the enhanced reserve price, and the strong bidder response. The later re-auction, in which no bidder came forward, reinforced the absence of a rational assessment. The rejection was therefore held arbitrary, irrational and vitiated by non-application of mind, and the bid was required to be accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:49:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 689 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274157</link>
      <description>Rejection of the highest bid in a public auction is valid only if based on relevant considerations and a reasoned, non-arbitrary process consistent with Article 14. The approving authority compared the hotel plot with smaller plots at a different location without properly accounting for differences in size, use, location, prior failed auctions, the enhanced reserve price, and the strong bidder response. The later re-auction, in which no bidder came forward, reinforced the absence of a rational assessment. The rejection was therefore held arbitrary, irrational and vitiated by non-application of mind, and the bid was required to be accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>