<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1194 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274156</link>
    <description>The Board held that the petitioner-company established a prima facie case for entitlement to shares and that the composite petition under sections 397/398 was maintainable. Proceedings before the CLB were stayed for six months to facilitate a settlement, with interim orders remaining in effect. The application contesting maintainability was resolved accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:25:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1194 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274156</link>
      <description>The Board held that the petitioner-company established a prima facie case for entitlement to shares and that the composite petition under sections 397/398 was maintainable. Proceedings before the CLB were stayed for six months to facilitate a settlement, with interim orders remaining in effect. The application contesting maintainability was resolved accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>