<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1531 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274148</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by dismissing the additional ground of Rs. 93,500 added to sales, deleting the addition of Rs. 6,66,643 as deemed dividend, allowing the claim of bad debts amounting to Rs. 29,28,311, and deleting penalties under section 271(1)(c) for both assessment years. The Tribunal considered factors such as trading nature of transactions, operational status of the business, lack of understanding of tax implications, and incorrect advice in its decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:27:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1531 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274148</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by dismissing the additional ground of Rs. 93,500 added to sales, deleting the addition of Rs. 6,66,643 as deemed dividend, allowing the claim of bad debts amounting to Rs. 29,28,311, and deleting penalties under section 271(1)(c) for both assessment years. The Tribunal considered factors such as trading nature of transactions, operational status of the business, lack of understanding of tax implications, and incorrect advice in its decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>