<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1814 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364506</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to restrict the quantification of undisclosed income to the extent of incriminating material found during the search and to tax the on-money receipts in the year the project is completed, as the assessee follows the project completion method for revenue recognition. The addition of Rs. 18,82,59,020 was set aside for limited quantification based on incriminating material and to be taxed in the appropriate year of project completion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1814 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364506</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to restrict the quantification of undisclosed income to the extent of incriminating material found during the search and to tax the on-money receipts in the year the project is completed, as the assessee follows the project completion method for revenue recognition. The addition of Rs. 18,82,59,020 was set aside for limited quantification based on incriminating material and to be taxed in the appropriate year of project completion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>