<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1813 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364505</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the AO to delete the addition made towards the disallowance of revenue expenses claimed. The Tribunal held that the expenses, though treated as pre-operative in the books, were revenue in nature and incurred for business expansion, relying on judicial precedents emphasizing the nature of expenses for tax treatment. The decision overturned the CIT(A) and AO&#039;s findings, concluding in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1813 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364505</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the AO to delete the addition made towards the disallowance of revenue expenses claimed. The Tribunal held that the expenses, though treated as pre-operative in the books, were revenue in nature and incurred for business expansion, relying on judicial precedents emphasizing the nature of expenses for tax treatment. The decision overturned the CIT(A) and AO&#039;s findings, concluding in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>