<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1811 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364503</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, allowing the exclusion of royalty payment under the Corporate Division, deleting the disallowance under Section 14A, treating the excise duty refund as a capital receipt, and excluding it from the book profit under Section 115JB. The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, based on precedents from earlier assessment years. The decision was issued on 26th July 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1811 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364503</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues, allowing the exclusion of royalty payment under the Corporate Division, deleting the disallowance under Section 14A, treating the excise duty refund as a capital receipt, and excluding it from the book profit under Section 115JB. The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, based on precedents from earlier assessment years. The decision was issued on 26th July 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>