https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364500 The tribunal determined that the assessee established an Installation Permanent Establishment (PE) in India for certain projects but ruled that offshore activities should not be taxed in India. It held that only onshore activities were attributable to the alleged PE for tax purposes. The tribunal also clarified the taxability of maintenance services and directed the assessing officer to follow specific directions regarding interest, surcharge, and TDS credit. The appeals were partly allowed, affirming some decisions while directing compliance with specific directives. en-us Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jul 2018 07:45:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364500 The tribunal determined that the assessee established an Installation Permanent Establishment (PE) in India for certain projects but ruled that offshore activities should not be taxed in India. It held that only onshore activities were attributable to the alleged PE for tax purposes. The tribunal also clarified the taxability of maintenance services and directed the assessing officer to follow specific directions regarding interest, surcharge, and TDS credit. The appeals were partly allowed, affirming some decisions while directing compliance with specific directives. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364500