<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1792 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Original Adjudicating Authority to quantify the demand falling within the limitation period. Penalties imposed on the appellant were set aside, and the appeal was dismissed in the specified manner due to the absence of evidence showing mala-fide intent in credit availing, leading to the demand being barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 07:44:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1792 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the Original Adjudicating Authority to quantify the demand falling within the limitation period. Penalties imposed on the appellant were set aside, and the appeal was dismissed in the specified manner due to the absence of evidence showing mala-fide intent in credit availing, leading to the demand being barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>