https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364479 The Tribunal upheld the Original Authority's decision in favor of the respondent in a case concerning the interpretation of Rule 6(3A)(a)(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Revenue's appeal was rejected as the Tribunal found that the respondent had correctly reversed the Cenvat credit attributable to exempted services for the relevant period, based on verification by the Jurisdictional Range Superintendent. The decision emphasized the importance of complying with the rule by reversing Cenvat credit and confirmed that the respondent had fulfilled this requirement, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. en-us Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Jul 2018 07:44:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364479 The Tribunal upheld the Original Authority's decision in favor of the respondent in a case concerning the interpretation of Rule 6(3A)(a)(ii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Revenue's appeal was rejected as the Tribunal found that the respondent had correctly reversed the Cenvat credit attributable to exempted services for the relevant period, based on verification by the Jurisdictional Range Superintendent. The decision emphasized the importance of complying with the rule by reversing Cenvat credit and confirmed that the respondent had fulfilled this requirement, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364479