<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1704 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274139</link>
    <description>The court upheld the ITAT&#039;s findings, dismissing the appeals and ruling in favor of the assessee. The ITAT&#039;s decisions to delete additions related to unexplained investment in house property, disallowance of interest, undisclosed cash advances, unexplained gold jewellery and silver, and loss under income from other sources were deemed justified. The court found the ITAT&#039;s reasoning rational and supported by evidence, leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s claims against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 07:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1704 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274139</link>
      <description>The court upheld the ITAT&#039;s findings, dismissing the appeals and ruling in favor of the assessee. The ITAT&#039;s decisions to delete additions related to unexplained investment in house property, disallowance of interest, undisclosed cash advances, unexplained gold jewellery and silver, and loss under income from other sources were deemed justified. The court found the ITAT&#039;s reasoning rational and supported by evidence, leading to the dismissal of the department&#039;s claims against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>