https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274123 Where an employer's own order fixed a terminal date for service, a later retrospective extension made after that date could not revive a relationship that had already ended by operation of the earlier order. The service was kept alive only up to the period expressly stated in the order of 6 January 1961, and no further order was issued before the service expired. An order made later, purporting to extend service from 1 April 1961, was therefore outside jurisdiction and invalid. The writ petition was properly allowed and the appeal failed. en-us Fri, 23 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jul 2018 14:14:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274123 Where an employer's own order fixed a terminal date for service, a later retrospective extension made after that date could not revive a relationship that had already ended by operation of the earlier order. The service was kept alive only up to the period expressly stated in the order of 6 January 1961, and no further order was issued before the service expired. An order made later, purporting to extend service from 1 April 1961, was therefore outside jurisdiction and invalid. The writ petition was properly allowed and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Nov 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274123