https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364455 The Court held that it had jurisdiction to decide on MIDC charges, determined that the transfer by the Official Liquidator is a formal and involuntary transfer, thus no differential premium is payable. Additionally, the Court found that it is the Competent Court to decide on the waiver of extension charges, directing MIDC to lodge its claim with the Official Liquidator for further assessment. en-us Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jul 2018 08:33:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364455 The Court held that it had jurisdiction to decide on MIDC charges, determined that the transfer by the Official Liquidator is a formal and involuntary transfer, thus no differential premium is payable. Additionally, the Court found that it is the Competent Court to decide on the waiver of extension charges, directing MIDC to lodge its claim with the Official Liquidator for further assessment. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364455