<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1748 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364440</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Taxation Authority&#039;s decision to reject the Cost Plus Method and the Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method, opting for the Transactional Net Margin Method as the most suitable for determining arm&#039;s length price. The Tribunal supported the inclusion of Persistent Systems Ltd. and directed the inclusion of Akshay Software Technologies Ltd. and Evoke Technologies Ltd. while excluding various companies due to functional disparities and lack of segmental data. The Tribunal endorsed the Taxation Authority&#039;s application of filters and use of current year data, emphasizing the importance of consistency and accurate data for Transfer Pricing studies. The appeal was partially allowed, with specific directions on comparable company inclusion and exclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1748 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364440</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Taxation Authority&#039;s decision to reject the Cost Plus Method and the Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method, opting for the Transactional Net Margin Method as the most suitable for determining arm&#039;s length price. The Tribunal supported the inclusion of Persistent Systems Ltd. and directed the inclusion of Akshay Software Technologies Ltd. and Evoke Technologies Ltd. while excluding various companies due to functional disparities and lack of segmental data. The Tribunal endorsed the Taxation Authority&#039;s application of filters and use of current year data, emphasizing the importance of consistency and accurate data for Transfer Pricing studies. The appeal was partially allowed, with specific directions on comparable company inclusion and exclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>