<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1733 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364425</link>
    <description>Filling mushroom powder into gelatine capsules was treated as manufacture or production because the process created a commercially distinct product through controlled filling, quality checks, polishing, sorting, bottling and packing, supporting deduction under section 80IB. Excise duty payment was also held allowable under section 43B since the liability had crystallized, payment was admitted, and the claim could not be denied merely because of its accounting presentation. By contrast, the allegation of denial of cross-examination failed because no concrete prejudice was shown, so no actionable breach of natural justice was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1733 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364425</link>
      <description>Filling mushroom powder into gelatine capsules was treated as manufacture or production because the process created a commercially distinct product through controlled filling, quality checks, polishing, sorting, bottling and packing, supporting deduction under section 80IB. Excise duty payment was also held allowable under section 43B since the liability had crystallized, payment was admitted, and the claim could not be denied merely because of its accounting presentation. By contrast, the allegation of denial of cross-examination failed because no concrete prejudice was shown, so no actionable breach of natural justice was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>