<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1719 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364411</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against an Order-in-Original concerning Service Tax demand and Cenvat Credit. The Revenue successfully argued that the normal time limit under Section 73(1) should consider the extended date for filing ST-3 Returns, leading to the inclusion of the disputed period in the confirmed demand. Consequently, the adjudicating authority was directed to recalculate the Service Tax demand, incorporating the relevant period and reassessing the interest and penalties imposed under Section 76.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2018 12:29:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1719 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364411</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against an Order-in-Original concerning Service Tax demand and Cenvat Credit. The Revenue successfully argued that the normal time limit under Section 73(1) should consider the extended date for filing ST-3 Returns, leading to the inclusion of the disputed period in the confirmed demand. Consequently, the adjudicating authority was directed to recalculate the Service Tax demand, incorporating the relevant period and reassessing the interest and penalties imposed under Section 76.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>