<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1716 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364408</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the appellant&#039;s liability for service tax on renting immovable property and the retrospective tax imposition. The appellant was directed to pay interest under Section 75 but granted immunity from penalties under Section 80 of the Act. The Adjudicating Authority was instructed to reassess the demand based on the tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2018 12:27:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1716 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364408</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the appellant&#039;s liability for service tax on renting immovable property and the retrospective tax imposition. The appellant was directed to pay interest under Section 75 but granted immunity from penalties under Section 80 of the Act. The Adjudicating Authority was instructed to reassess the demand based on the tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>