<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1711 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364403</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in various instances regarding the denial of Cenvat Credit. The appellant was not required to reverse the credit on moulds and dies cleared to job workers, excess credit due to price reduction, old capital goods cleared after use, and inputs cleared as scrap. However, the denial of credit on inputs found short during physical verification was upheld. No penalties were imposed on the appellants, and the appeals were disposed of based on the Tribunal&#039;s observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2018 12:23:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1711 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364403</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in various instances regarding the denial of Cenvat Credit. The appellant was not required to reverse the credit on moulds and dies cleared to job workers, excess credit due to price reduction, old capital goods cleared after use, and inputs cleared as scrap. However, the denial of credit on inputs found short during physical verification was upheld. No penalties were imposed on the appellants, and the appeals were disposed of based on the Tribunal&#039;s observations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>