<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1699 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364391</link>
    <description>A live musical concert was treated as falling within Schedule III of the Gujarat Entertainments Tax Act, 1977, which expressly includes musical programmes and excludes them from the charging provision. Because the entertainment was already placed in a non-taxable category under section 3A, the exemption mechanism in section 29, which applies to taxable entertainments and imposes conditions for exemption, could not be applied. The Supreme Court rejected the State&#039;s attempt to read a restriction into the plain language of the statute and held that exemption conditions cannot be superimposed on an excluded class of entertainment. The levy therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1699 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364391</link>
      <description>A live musical concert was treated as falling within Schedule III of the Gujarat Entertainments Tax Act, 1977, which expressly includes musical programmes and excludes them from the charging provision. Because the entertainment was already placed in a non-taxable category under section 3A, the exemption mechanism in section 29, which applies to taxable entertainments and imposes conditions for exemption, could not be applied. The Supreme Court rejected the State&#039;s attempt to read a restriction into the plain language of the statute and held that exemption conditions cannot be superimposed on an excluded class of entertainment. The levy therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>